Abundance is considered by time and the total of the money and the energy.
The general linear measure of abundance is false.
To do maximize abundance?
1.Abundance is considered by time and the total of the money and the energy.
1.General sense of values
The work well paid is generally more valuable than the work which isn't so, and you're thinking abundant living can be done.
Is it really so really?
When judging from only the side of the money certainly, it would be so.
But a stress and the pressure generally say, and are strong in work of high pay, and the working hours are also long.
When there are also a lot of overtime work without pay and service
holiday work to work of payment good seemingly, when doing hourly wage
conversion, it's work of rather inexpensive payment (´ ω* ').
When working hours are long, private time is less the minute, and abundance of time wouldn't be felt.
If a stress and the pressure are strong work, a holiday has much energy
stolen, and is run after to cancel a collected stress to work, and I get
tired, and, as I sleep, it'll be sometimes.
Abundance by the energy surface wouldn't also be felt in case of this.
The money is also important for certain, but it's also important how much time and energy were used to earn the money.
If the hourly wage is easy work by the easiness which has a stress and
the pressure even if it's inexpensive, it's expensive, but the hourly
wage may be benefiting more than the work to use much energy with a lot
of stresses and pressures without using almost all energy.
| Work | The hourly wage | It's necessary per 1 hour. The energy |
The hourly wage per the energy semester hour (The payment by the hour/energy needed per 1 hour) |
The profitable order |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 800 yen | 3 | 266.7 | 1 |
| B | 1600 yen | 8 | 200 | 2 |
| C | 2400 yen | 15 | 160 | 3 |
The most profitable work judged from time and the total of the money and the energy will be work A at the upper table.
2.The linear measure which measures abundance of the life
I think there is a linear
measure which measures abundance of the life variously, but I'd like to
think from time and the linear measure called money and the energy
here.
The person who has much time will be more abundant than the person who isn't so.
The person who has much money will be more abundant than the person who isn't so.
(The life) the person who has much energy will be more abundant than the person who isn't so.
I think it's good to here, but it'll be that these
time, money and energy will be often the relation in which one
diminishes when I get one, to be complicated.
For example when I work, money increases, but time and the energy decrease.
When using the Shinkansen, time can be saved, but money decreases.
When doing an entertainment, the (life) energy is convalescent, but time and money decrease.
When the energy also has money only a little even if there is much time, abundance wouldn't be felt easily.
When there are time and the energy only a little even if there is much money, abundance wouldn't be felt easily.
When also having money only a little time even if there is a serving of energy, abundance wouldn't be felt easily.
Maybe it's so proper to think the linear measure of abundance to think by time and the total of the money and the energy.
When time and the total of the money and the energy are biggest, can't it be said that the person is most abundant?
It'll be a knack to distribute time and the energy to work wisely to maximize time and the total of the money and the energy.
It'll be often in the state abundance can't feel to distribute time and the energy to work too much easily when there are time and the energy only a little even if there is often much money, as the top was written.
| Work | The hourly wage | It's necessary per 1 hour. The energy |
The hourly wage per the energy semester hour (The payment by the hour/energy needed per 1 hour) |
The profitable order |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 800 yen | 3 | 266.7 | 1 |
| B | 1600 yen | 8 | 200 | 2 |
| C | 2400 yen | 15 | 160 | 3 |
If it's a table above-mentioned, if I say, work A get it from time and
the total of the money and the energy most! If it's judged by the
judgement which can be judged and the total, work A get it most! So work
A is chosen! I'd like to grow the decisiveness which says so.
If I begin to work by work A actually, I think the hourly wage will be
in the state such as feeling room for some reason though it should be
inexpensive.
An energy efficiencies is good for that, it's because how to work is
being done, and the work which has no stresses, so it's because I don't
have my time and money stolen for stress alleviation.
I think this is to be also able to say from my actual life experience, not a paper on a desk.
2.Abundance is considered by time and the total of the money and the energy. - Summary
1.Work will also consider and choose the necessary energy (the stress pressure)
to make up with substantial working hours and the work as well as the hourly
wage and the height of the payment!
2.When work is chosen only by the hourly wage and the height of the payment,
I'll know sometimes rather to lose money!
I return to a top page. To do live happily? I return to a category.
