An expectation to itself is lowered.
To the person who gives in by sociability.
To the person who tends to be a perfect principle.
1.The mechanism by which man gives in
I'm the man who tends to give in.
Because he gave in and did spicy concern constantly, man analyzed and saw
a mechanism which becomes hollow because it didn't become hollow.
Some mistaken-> becomes hollow.
This is a general mechanism, well, last time.
-> which fails in-> which expects that you can do well becomes hollow.
An expectation is included as the precondition.
Therefore it becomes hollow.
-> by which I think I make a mistake of course is as I thought of mistaken->
(It doesn't become hollow particularly.)
It should be.
Oneself analyzes myself, and this is that I noticed....
When an expectation doesn't materialize, a person feels the biggest pain.
2.In purpose which doesn't become hollow
An expectation to itself is lowered.
It's simply this.
Everyone generally says, and overestimates himself badly for a person including
me.
I'm not such wonderful man and everyone wouldn't be a saint monarch to
there, either.
Because an expectation to itself is high, it becomes hollow in the actuality
by which the standard as expected can't be cleared.
When lowering an expectation from the beginning, the expectation standard
can be cleared anytime mostly, and I'm happily anytime mostly (warai).
This is the true talk I think that which is false.
1.In sociability.
The reason that I give in by sociability is also same.
Because the expectation imposed on oneself in sociability is high, it becomes
hollow for itself who can't grant the expectation.
When thinking you can't do well from the beginning, even if you can't do
well, I'd think as nothing.
Even if it seems hollow by partner's behavior, actual condition is often
hollow for itself who couldn't correspond to the behavior well.
The expectation to which I say "It should be able to correspond to
partner's behavior well." worries itself.
I'll give an expectation to myself, but I'll lower, but because neither
the behavior nor a result change, the lowered one gets an expectation on
the mental health.
It's that I'll be satisfied with 60 points concretely.
When being hollow by sociability, 90 points and 100 points are often expected
to themselves.
2.To the person who tends to be a perfect principle.
It tends to be a perfect principle for me, too.
Whether it was lay before became quite better, but the tendency of the
perfect principle sometimes shows its nose.
When falling into a perfect principle, it's inefficient, isn't it?
It isn't inefficient, but one step can't also move any more.
As a measure of a perfect principle
It doesn't need to be perfect.
It's to think so.
That I move forward, "One isn't the man who can do perfectly and.",
it's to lower the expectation.
When giving up doing perfectly from the beginning, I don't fall into a
perfect principle (warai).
When the expectation a perfect principle asks is 100, it's to hang the
standard I find on 60 points.
That I'll be satisfied with 60 points.
And it's an important thing, that I won't be here even if I'll be here
by a perfect principle, when I think I don't also carry one step further
any more if a result is the perfect principle which doesn't change so much,
it's said that they can bring about the results for which it's better to
give up a perfect principle.
It's an ironical thing, but when I try to do perfectly, I back away from
perfection.
Thus however wasteful a perfect principle be, and how does non-efficiency
understand well that a perfect principle will be considered strictly?
Even if I live loosely properly leisurely even if it's OK and isn't perfect,
it'll be somehow (warai).
The article written on this my HP is also suitable and loose and (warai).
I return to a top page. To do live happily? I return to a category.
